Why clojure is better than scala




















But in the other hand scala is more like java and other popular languages and feels natural for them. But in general I found scala too complicate I asked several of my friends to give clojure a try. Most of them argued at first of course because the parentheses but after they tried the language they actually liked it. I think that this is quite outdated. Maybe a one or two years ago …but right now I am getting more and more job offers from Clojure then from even Python.

Most of them are connected with AI or ClojureScript. This topic was automatically closed days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed. With the help of Clojure, we can access Java libraries and their frameworks. Its benefits include it is flexible and dynamic under an effective system like JVM.

Scala : It is a compiler-based and multi-paradigm programming language that is compact, speedy, and efficient. It is successful to work with records that are saved in a Distributed fashion. It accesses all the accessible assets and helps parallel data processing.

Scala helps more than one kind of Constructs which permits the programmer to work with container sorts with ease. Difference Between Clojure and Scala : S. Clojure Scala 1. It is developed from the Lisp language. It is not created from any other language.

It is not much popular than Scala. It is very popular as compared to Clojure. It follows a consistent architecture. It does not follow a consistent architecture. It requires macros for working on different data structures. Running on top of the JVM also gives both languages full access to the huge array of standard and third party libraries that would be available to any regular Java program, so no need to reimplement all those web frameworks and http stacks we all rely on.

Programs written in both languages can, with a little work, also be exposed to any regular Java program. Scala is statically typed whereas Clojure is typed dynamically although Clojure does have library, core. So, a function defined as 1. Clojure takes a different approach by starting you out with lists, vectors, maps and sets and a multitude of functions to act on them. The idea appears to be that they should be used only when some aspect of the map collection is found to be deficient.

This has lead to a very wide and powerful syntax. For example, here are 4 ways to call toString on a list:. This allows the natural implementation of a wide array of domain specific languages without having to write the associated parsing code. With all this power though comes responsibility and developers are left with the decision as to how large a subset of Scala they wish to use in any one project.

This has lead to several different implementations including one that runs on the MicroSoft CLR and one that is compiled down to JavaScript.

To implement DSLs in Clojure usually requires the use of macros which can also be immensely powerful, but requires great care to be used correctly.

This sort of leads on from the point above.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000